From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values of PF_INET and AF_INET are the same. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ struct sockaddr_in sip; @@ ( sip.sin_family == - PF_INET + AF_INET | sip.sin_family != - PF_INET + AF_INET | sip.sin_family = - PF_INET + AF_INET ) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> --- net/rds/rdma_transport.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -u -p a/net/rds/rdma_transport.c b/net/rds/rdma_transport.c --- a/net/rds/rdma_transport.c +++ b/net/rds/rdma_transport.c @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int __init rds_rdma_listen_init(v goto out; } - sin.sin_family = PF_INET, + sin.sin_family = AF_INET, sin.sin_addr.s_addr = (__force u32)htonl(INADDR_ANY); sin.sin_port = (__force u16)htons(RDS_PORT); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
