Re: [PATCH 6/12] drivers/platform/x86: Correct redundant test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Julia Lawall wrote:
> [...]
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c          |    3 ---
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> index 218b9a1..5306901 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> @@ -745,9 +745,6 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
>  
>  	fujitsu = acpi_driver_data(device);
>  
> -	if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -

Shouldn't this still do a:

   if (!fujitsu)
     return -EINVAL;

to avoid dereferencing a NULL pointer below?

>  	fujitsu->acpi_handle = NULL;
>  
>  	return 0;

-- 
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

"All I ask is a chance to prove that money can't make me happy."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux