Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Olaf Weber wrote:

> Julia Lawall writes:
> 
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx>
> > The result of container_of should not be NULL.  In particular, in this case
> > the argument to the enclosing function has passed though INIT_DELAYED_WORK,
> > which dereferences it, implying that its container cannot be NULL.
> 
> Given the defn of container_of() it seems clear that neither its input
> pointer nor its result should ever be NULL.

container_of just does pointer arithmetic.  The result of that arithmetic 
can be NULL, ie if the argument was obtained from an expression of the 
form &x->f where x was NULL.  But in principle, values should be checked 
for NULL beforehand.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux