Re: Are the cast necessary in function "kfree"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Paul Mundt schrieb:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:30:21AM +0100, Andr? Lopes wrote:
>> Hi. This is my first post :-)
>>
>> I was reading this doc (/linux-2.6/Documentation/scsi/ChangeLog.lpfc),
>> when I found this phrase: "Replace some kfree((void*)ptr) with
>> kfree(ptr)."
>>
> [snip]
> 
>> These casts are not necessary...I think so. If it's yes, can we apply
>> patch's to clean-up this?
>>
> The key thing here is "ptr", as long as these are pointers, then the cast
> is superfluous. In the case of casting from a non-pointer type, the cast
> is necessary, particularly if the data type and pointer size vary.

i think the problem is clear,

since he ask for advice..
IMHO i would start with identifying adding a marker
like /* cast needed ...*/, perhaps creating a  myfree(propper type).

that would document the use and prevent other people from converting.

just my 2 cents,
re,
 wh



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux