[PATCH 1/7] sound/usb/usx2y: fix sparse warning: Should it be static?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Impact: Move declaration to header file.

Fix this sparse warning:
  sound/usb/usx2y/usx2yhwdeppcm.c:739:5: warning: symbol 'usX2Y_hwdep_pcm_new' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 sound/usb/usx2y/usX2Yhwdep.c    |    3 ---
 sound/usb/usx2y/usx2yhwdeppcm.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/usb/usx2y/usX2Yhwdep.c b/sound/usb/usx2y/usX2Yhwdep.c
index a26d8d8..4af8740 100644
--- a/sound/usb/usx2y/usX2Yhwdep.c
+++ b/sound/usb/usx2y/usX2Yhwdep.c
@@ -30,9 +30,6 @@
 #include "usbusx2y.h"
 #include "usX2Yhwdep.h"
 
-int usX2Y_hwdep_pcm_new(struct snd_card *card);
-
-
 static int snd_us428ctls_vm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *area,
 				  struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
diff --git a/sound/usb/usx2y/usx2yhwdeppcm.h b/sound/usb/usx2y/usx2yhwdeppcm.h
index c3382fd..9c4fb84 100644
--- a/sound/usb/usx2y/usx2yhwdeppcm.h
+++ b/sound/usb/usx2y/usx2yhwdeppcm.h
@@ -18,3 +18,5 @@ struct snd_usX2Y_hwdep_pcm_shm {
 	volatile unsigned captured_iso_frames;
 	int capture_iso_start;
 };
+
+int usX2Y_hwdep_pcm_new(struct snd_card *card);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux