Re: [PATCH] init/main.c: fix sparse warnings: context imbalance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Richter wrote:
> Hannes Eder wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Stefan Richter
>> <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> It is not a fix, it's merely an annotation.
>> This patch 'better word for fix's a warning reported by sparse. What
>> better wording would you suggest?
> 
> "annotate init_post() as releasing the BKL" or whatever in the title,
> furthermore "Removes the following sparse warnings: ..." in the changelog.

PS:  In some sense it is indeed a "fix" for the high-level problem that
sparse can't guess whether the context imbalance is correct or not.  The
original warning from sparse was correct in itself.  Your annotation
enables sparse to warn if problems outside the scope of the single
function occur (I guess).  So it's more a maintainabiliy improvement
than a fix.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= --=- =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux