Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Storage class should be before const qualifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Storage class should be before const qualifier
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:31:38 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>, airlied@xxxxxxxx, trivial@xxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <21d7e9970902160529m297a20a9l82475b544947a4d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 1.10 (LNX 962 2008-03-14)

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Dave Airlie wrote:

> Its in my queue for Linus drm-fixes tree already.

OK, dropped.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH] drm/i915: Storage class should be before const qualifier
  - From: Tobias Klauser
- Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Storage class should be before const qualifier
  - From: Jiri Kosina
- Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Storage class should be before const qualifier
  - From: Dave Airlie

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Storage class should be before const qualifier
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove errors caught by checkpatch.pl in kernel/kallsyms.c
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Storage class should be before const qualifier
Next by thread: [PATCH] ieee1394: Storage class should be before const qualifier
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux