On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 01:00:08PM +0200, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:37:42PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 17:18, Vorobiev Dmitri wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:26, Julia Lawall wrote: > >>>>> The return value of the remove function of a driver structure, and thus > >>>>> of > >>>>> a platform_driver structure, is ultimately ignored, and is thus > >>>>> unnecessary. The goal of this patch is to make it possible to convert > >>>>> the > >>>>> platform_driver functions stored in the remove field such that they > >>>>> return > >>>>> void. This patch introduces a temporary field remove_new with return > >>>>> type > >>>>> void into the platform_driver structure, and updates the only place that > >>>>> the remove function is called to call the function in the remove_new > >>>>> field, > >>>>> if one is available. The subsequent patches update some drivers to use > >>>>> the > >>>>> remove_new field. > >>>> why bother with remove -> remove_new convention ? > >>> Please see this email for the background: > >>> > >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/10/231 > >>> > >>>> you'll get a > >>>> warning in C about the assignment, but you wont get a build failure, > >>> ...unless you compile with -Werror, which frequently the case. > >> anyone crazy enough to build with -Werror is crazy enough to send in a fix ;) > > > > Hm, have you noted that some arches have that flag enabled in their > > build? > > > > And it's not ok to add a couple of hundred build warnings to the system, > > sorry. > > Still, what about the whole series? What do you think about int->void > migration for the remove() callback? In thinking about it some more, I don't really see the point. We should probably just do something about the return value, as that would be better, and easier to do. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html