On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:55:03 +0100 (CET) Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > > ARRAY_SIZE is more concise to use when the size of an array is > divided by the size of its type or the size of its first element. Hi, looking at your patch, I don't think I agree it's just blindly the right thing to do. > - *count = sizeof(RegAddr) / sizeof(u8); > + *count = ARRAY_SIZE(RegAddr); really. ARRAY_SIZE doesn't appear to be an improvement here.. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
