Hello Alexander, On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 15:51 +0200, Alexander van Heukelum wrote: > > I think moving the declarations to a header file is a good thing, > but I don't think mach_traps.h is a suitable place. I CC new patch to you : [PATCH] x86: Introducing asm-x86/traps.h > The definitions > of the functions are in entry_32.S and entry_64.S, so I would suggest > making a new header include/asm-x86/entry.h. Some other ENTRY's > (like system_call and some xen-specific ones) would then also fit > in this header. > > What do you think? I did this for traps_32.c and traps_64.c because they are complaining that traps are defined but not declared. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
