On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:45:55AM +0100, Will Newton wrote: >> >> Would the linux-staging tree be an appropriate place to merge a new >> architecture? Or would that be too large a change and should go via >> its own tree? > > That is probably too big to go into -staging and should deserve its own > tree based on the size of patches that have gone into creating a new > architecture in the past. Our tree is about 26000 lines of diff, including a few drivers. > Do you have an example of one that is currently not included in the main > kernel tree right now? I have a tree that is currently about half way to public consumption, although I don't think there's any point pushing it until we have a publically available toolchain. > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
