Julia Lawall wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Francois Romieu wrote:
Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> :
[...]
diff -u -p a/drivers/net/au1000_eth.c b/drivers/net/au1000_eth.c
--- a/drivers/net/au1000_eth.c 2008-04-27 11:41:11.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/net/au1000_eth.c 2008-05-12 09:32:54.000000000 +0200
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ static irqreturn_t au1000_interrupt(int
struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *) dev_id;
if (dev == NULL) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: isr: null dev ptr\n", dev->name);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "isr: null dev ptr\n");
return IRQ_RETVAL(1);
}
The lifespan of 'dev' covers the request_irq..free_irq interval in this
driver. The whole 'dev == NULL' block can be removed.
Will you do that?
It's normal within the Linux community to give feedback on patches, and
sometimes the authors need to revise their patches if helpful feedback
arises.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
