man, 12 05 2008 kl. 15:37 +0200, skrev Julia Lawall: > From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > > If data is NULL, it is not possible to access data->ret. > > The problem was detected using the following semantic match > (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) > > // <smpl> > @@ > expression E, E1; > identifier f; > statement S1,S2,S3; > @@ > > * if (E == NULL) > { > ... when != if (E == NULL) S1 else S2 > when != E = E1 > * E->f > ... when any > return ...; > } > else S3 > // </smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > diff -u -p a/arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c > --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c 2008-05-09 16:46:57.000000000 +0200 > +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/palinfo.c 2008-05-12 08:43:35.000000000 +0200 > @@ -902,7 +902,6 @@ palinfo_smp_call(void *info) > palinfo_smp_data_t *data = (palinfo_smp_data_t *)info; > if (data == NULL) { > printk(KERN_ERR "palinfo: data pointer is NULL\n"); > - data->ret = 0; /* no output */ > return; > } > /* does this actual call */ > -- The whole if block should just be deleted, as info is never NULL. There is only palinfo_handle_smp as (indirect) user of palinfo_smp_call (by way of smp_call_function_single) and surely palinfo_smp_call never pass NULL. Simon Holm Thøgersen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html