I've also noticed another issue, it appears that I accidentally gave PATCH 2/9 the wrong subject. Patch 2/9 actually fixes /drivers/net/ac3200.c, while PATCH 1/9 is the one that fixes /drivers/net/8390.c. What's the easiest way to fix these two patches? Do you want to just back out patches 1 & 2 and I can send them as part of a different patch set? If I change the subject for PATCH 2/9, it might be hard for others to follow this thread. Sorry for the trouble, I'm still getting familiar the mechanics of patch submission. Jon Jon Schindler wrote: > I'm sorry, ns8390_init_module should be ns8390_module_init. I'll resend it in the next reply. > Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:30:25 -0600 >> Jon Schindler <jkschind@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Replaced init_module and cleanup_module with static functions and module_init/module_exit. >> I get >> >> drivers/net/8390.c: In function '__inittest': >> drivers/net/8390.c:60: error: 'ns8390_init_module' undeclared (first use in this function) >> drivers/net/8390.c:60: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once >> drivers/net/8390.c:60: error: for each function it appears in.) >> drivers/net/8390.c: At top level: >> drivers/net/8390.c:60: error: 'init_module' aliased to undefined symbol 'ns8390_init_module' >> >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
