On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:56:18PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > > if (...) BUG(); should be replaced with BUG_ON(...) when the test has no > side-effects to allow a definition of BUG_ON that drops the code completely. The same change is in my patch which is waiting for inclusion. http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/30/512 > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: > (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) > > // <smpl> > @ disable unlikely @ expression E,f; @@ > > ( > if (<... f(...) ...>) { BUG(); } > | > - if (unlikely(E)) { BUG(); } > + BUG_ON(E); > ) > > @@ expression E,f; @@ > > ( > if (<... f(...) ...>) { BUG(); } > | > - if (E) { BUG(); } > + BUG_ON(E); > ) > // </smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > diff -u -p a/fs/udf/truncate.c b/fs/udf/truncate.c > --- a/fs/udf/truncate.c 2008-02-10 22:34:15.000000000 +0100 > +++ b/fs/udf/truncate.c 2008-02-17 16:41:19.000000000 +0100 > @@ -224,8 +224,7 @@ void udf_truncate_extents(struct inode * > if (indirect_ext_len) { > /* We managed to free all extents in the > * indirect extent - free it too */ > - if (!epos.bh) > - BUG(); > + BUG_ON(!epos.bh); > udf_free_blocks(sb, inode, epos.block, > 0, indirect_ext_len); > } else { > @@ -272,8 +271,7 @@ void udf_truncate_extents(struct inode * > } > > if (indirect_ext_len) { > - if (!epos.bh) > - BUG(); > + BUG_ON(!epos.bh); > udf_free_blocks(sb, inode, epos.block, 0, > indirect_ext_len); > } else { > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
