given that explicit usage of SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED is deprecated, i
just want to clarify that getting rid of the few remaining
declarations of arrays of those would be represented by the general
patch:
=====
diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c b/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c
index 77e655f..f5aa705 100644
--- a/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
#define FLUSH_ALL (void*)0xffffffff
/* Vector of locks used for various atomic operations */
-spinlock_t cris_atomic_locks[] = { [0 ... LOCK_COUNT - 1] = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED};
+raw_spinlock_t cris_atomic_locks[] = { [0 ... LOCK_COUNT - 1] = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED};
/* CPU masks */
cpumask_t cpu_online_map = CPU_MASK_NONE;
=====
that is, you obviously can't use the preferred DEFINE_SPINLOCK since
you have an array, so the only other option is to use
__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, is that correct?
there's only a few instances of that left and i can easily submit
patches to take care of that.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Home page: http://crashcourse.ca
Fedora Cookbook: http://crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Fedora_Cookbook
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
