On 19:59, Andi Kleen wrote: > But perhaps for such a long ioctl handler it would be better to move > the lock/unlock_kernel()s into the individual case ...: statements; > then it could be eliminated step by step. Sure, I can do that if James likes the idea. Since not all case statements need the BKL, we could add it only to those for which it isn't clear that it is unnecessary. And this would actually improve something. Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
