On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:26:26 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> > > default:
> > > printk("%s: Unimplemented ioctl 0x%x\n", tape->name, cmd);
> > > + unlock_kernel();
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > Surely a bug ... shouldn't this return -ENOTTY?
Agreed - ENOTTY. The printk is wrong as well, but this is just getting
shown up by the other changes.
Does anyone even use parallel IDE devices any more ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
