Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 8, 2008 9:00 PM, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:58:04PM +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > -static const struct file_operations rtc_fops = {
> > +static long rtc_fioctl(struct file_operations rtc_fops)
> > +{
> > +     lock_kernel();
> >       .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>
> You should probably restrict yourself to files that you can at least
> compile ...

Yes of course, I've been silly in didn't verify whether the file compile
but I would appreciate to know whether I'm on the right track or not.

Switching to a different file now...

Thanks.

Ciao,
-- 
Paolo
http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux