Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/autofs: Use time_before, time_before_eq, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ray Lee wrote:
On Dec 26, 2007 7:21 AM, Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> wrote:
-               if (jiffies - ent->last_usage < timeout)
+               if (time_before(jiffies, ent->last_usage + timeout))

I don't think this is a safe change? subtraction is always safe (if
you think about it as 'distance'), addition isn't always safe unless
you know the range. The time_before macro will expand that out to
(effectively):

  if ( (long)(ent->last_usage + timeout) - (long)(jiffies) < 0 )

which seems to introduce an overflow condition in the first term.

Dunno, I may be wrong (happens often), but at the very least what
you've transformed it into is no longer obviously correct, and so it's
not a great change.

Indeed. The bottom form will have overflow issues at time jiffies_wraparound/2, whereas the top form will have overflow issues only near jiffies_wraparound/1.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux