On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:24:57PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > -/* These macros are used to mark some functions or > > - * initialized data (doesn't apply to uninitialized data) > > - * as `initialization' functions. The kernel can take this > > - * as hint that the function is used only during the initialization > > - * phase and free up used memory resources after > > +/* These macros are used to mark functions and initialized > > + * data as 'initialization' objects, which tells the kernel that > > + * they are used only during the initialization phase and can be > > + * freed afterwards to recover memory. > > If you're going to get rid of 'some', then you need to change 'are' to > 'may be' or 'can be'. i'm sorry, i don't see a problem here. that replacement text looks perfectly unambiguous. how do you think it might be misinterpreted? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
