On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, vignesh babu wrote: > Resending this...as I did not get the mail thru KJ... > > Robert, > > Maybe its late, but I would still like to discuss if it is > needed-is_power_of_2 has '2' and not 'two' which I think is easier to > work with. I was hoping that the 2 macros that you have coded can also > be named with a '2' in them than a 'two'. > > There have been many changes that went in already based on these 2 > macros.I have the cleanup patches ready(for log2.h AND all the changes > that went in), but my net at home went down, should be up in a few > hours and so i should be able to mail in the cleanups in a few hours. > > If you and others feel that the 'two's can be replaced with '2' then I > would push in the patches by tonight. sorry for the delay in answering this -- i suspect we're stuck with "two" since that's what the existing roundup macro used. does anyone else have a strong opinion on this either way? personally, i would have preferred "2", but it might be too late for that. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
