"Janne Grunau" <j@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:00:47PM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote: >> Add the trait `ParseInt` for parsing string representations of integers >> where the string representations are optionally prefixed by a radix >> specifier. Implement the trait for the primitive integer types. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> rust/kernel/str.rs | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/rust/kernel/str.rs b/rust/kernel/str.rs >> index db272d2198fcc..8b0d814b47f52 100644 >> --- a/rust/kernel/str.rs >> +++ b/rust/kernel/str.rs >> @@ -945,3 +945,121 @@ fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result { > > [...] > >> + pub trait ParseInt: FromStrRadix + TryFrom<i128> { >> + /// Parse a string according to the description in [`Self`]. >> + fn from_str(src: &BStr) -> Result<Self> { >> + match src.deref() { >> + [b'-', rest @ ..] => { >> + let (radix, digits) = strip_radix(rest.as_ref()); >> + // 2's complement values range from -2^(b-1) to 2^(b-1)-1. >> + // So if we want to parse negative numbers as positive and >> + // later multiply by -1, we have to parse into a larger >> + // integer. We choose i128 as sufficiently large. >> + let val = i128::from_str_radix( > > The usage of i128 causes here following link errors on arm64 with > "rustc 1.84.1 (e71f9a9a9 2025-01-27) (Fedora 1.84.1-1.fc41)" > > | ld: rust/kernel.o: in function `<i128>::from_str_radix': > | /usr/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/mod.rs:1563:(.text+0x3bc): undefined reference to `__muloti4' > | ld: /usr/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/mod.rs:1563:(.text+0x440): undefined reference to `__muloti4' > | ld: rust/kernel.o: in function `<i128>::overflowing_mul': > | /usr/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/int_macros.rs:2517:(.text+0x4b4): undefined reference to `__muloti4' > | ld: /usr/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/int_macros.rs:2517:(.text+0x534): undefined reference to `__muloti4' > > The errors go away after exchanging i128 with i64 (while breaking the > parsing for large values). Thanks for reporting! I will have to find a better way to fix this issue then. Best regards, Andreas Hindborg