Re: [PATCH] [RFC, DO NOT APPLY] vmlinux.lds: revert link speed regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 6:29 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> I noticed a regression in the time it takes to fully link some randconfig
> kernels and bisected this to commit 0043ecea2399 ("vmlinux.lds.h: Adjust
> symbol ordering in text output section"), which (among other changes) moves
> .text.unlikely ahead of .text.
>
> Partially reverting this makes the final link over six times faster again,
> back to what it was in linux-6.12:
>
>                 linux-6.12      linux-6.13
> ld.lld v20      1.2s            1.2s
> ld.bfd v2.36    3.2s            5.2s
> ld.bfd v2.39    59s             388s
>
> According to the commit description, that revert is not allowed here
> because with CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION, the .text.unlikely
> section name conflicts with the function-section names. On the other
> hand, the excessive link time happens both with and without that
> option, so the order could be conditional.
>
> I did not try to bisect the linker beyond trying multiple versions
> I had installed already, and it does feel like the behavior of recent
> versions (tested 2.39 and 2.42 with identical results) is broken in
> some form that earlier versions were not. According to 'perf', most
> of the time is spent in elf_link_adjust_relocs() and ext64l_r_offset().

Is this problem specific to the BFD linker from binutils?

Did you observe a link speed regression with LLVM=1 build?





--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada





[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux