On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 01:11:06PM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote: > On Wed 08 Jan 2025 13:34:28 GMT, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > There are various utilities in scripts/ which work with kconfig > > files. > > These have currently no maintainer. > > As most patches for them are applied through kconfig/kbuild anyways, > > add an explicit maintainership entry. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 30cbc3d44cd53e6b1a81d56161004d7ab825d7a9..2bd414fb3e6d6515b57a57a5f3d4d735137edcce 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -12385,6 +12385,9 @@ Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kbuild/list/ > > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git kbuild > > F: Documentation/kbuild/kconfig* > > F: scripts/Kconfig.include > > +F: scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py > > +F: scripts/config > > +F: scripts/diffconfig > > Thanks! > > Does it make sense to add scripts/extract-ikconfig also? It does not > handle kconfig language at all, but linux-kbuild would probably still a > good place for review. scripts/extract-ikconfig should be maintained together with kernel/configs.c. Today both are formally unmaintained. linux-kbuild picking up both looks reasonable to me. > Nevertheless, > > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks!
