On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 21:32:00 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is quite the insane interface -- but whatever. I still feel > strongly you should fix kallsyms so that we can all deal more sanely > with the weak crap. Question about fixing kallsyms, which I would like done too. I guess an invisible place holder for weak functions may be best. Saving the size of all functions could be memory wasteful. As there are a lot of functions: # wc -l /proc/kallsyms 207126 /proc/kallsyms What would be best? To add a placeholder where weak functions are, but they would not be printed in /proc/kallsyms? If a lookup occurs, and it lands on one of theses functions, to return "not found"? -- Steve
