On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 01:14:16PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:51:53AM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote: > > The exercise I am undertaking is to produce a drop in replacement of the > > existing C null_blk driver. If all goes well, we are considering to swap > > the C implementation for the Rust implementation in X number of years. > > Granted - a lot of things have to fall into place for that to happen, > > but that is the plan. This plan does not really work well if the two > > modules do not have the same interface. > > Why do you have to have the same interface? Why not do it "properly" > and make it use configfs that way you can have multiple devices and test > them all at the same time? Wait, null_blk already uses configfs, so just use that! I'd like to see the rust bindings for that api as that will be needed by lots of code. thanks, greg k-h
