On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 7:59 PM Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > By passing an additional directory to run-parts, allow Debian and its > derivatives an easy way to ship maintainer scripts in /usr while at the > same time allowing the local admin to easily override or disable them by > placing hooks of the same name in /etc. This adds support for the > mechanism described in the UAPI Configuration Files Specification for > kernel hooks: > https://uapi-group.org/specifications/specs/configuration_files_specification/ > > This functionality relies on run-parts 5.21 or later. If run-parts is > lacking support, only scripts in /etc/kernel will be considered. It is > the responsibility of packages installing hooks into /usr/share/kernel > to also declare a Depends: debianutils (>= 5.21). Signed-off-by: is required for any kernel patch. > --- > scripts/package/builddeb | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb > index 441b0bb66e0d..1fa5228eed0b 100755 > --- a/scripts/package/builddeb > +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb > @@ -5,10 +5,14 @@ > # > # Simple script to generate a deb package for a Linux kernel. All the > # complexity of what to do with a kernel after it is installed or removed > -# is left to other scripts and packages: they can install scripts in the > -# /etc/kernel/{pre,post}{inst,rm}.d/ directories (or an alternative location > -# specified in KDEB_HOOKDIR) that will be called on package install and > -# removal. > +# is left to other scripts and packages. Scripts can be placed into > +# the preinst, postinst, prerm and postrm directories in /etc/kernel > +# (override with KDEB_HOOKDIR) or /usr/share/kernel (override with > +# KDEB_DISTRO_HOOKDIR). Hooks of the same name in KDEB_HOOKDIR will override > +# hooks in KDEB_DISTRO_HOOKDIR. This, the former directory (usually in /etc) > +# can be used by the local admin while the latter directory (usually in /usr) > +# can be used by packages shipped by the distribution. The preinst, postinst, > +# prerm and postrm will then be called on package installation and removal. > > set -eu > > @@ -69,8 +73,10 @@ install_linux_image () { > # make-kpkg sets $INITRD to indicate whether an initramfs is wanted, and > # so do we; recent versions of dracut and initramfs-tools will obey this. > debhookdir=${KDEB_HOOKDIR:-/etc/kernel} > + debdistrohookdir=${KDEB_DISTRO_HOOKDIR:-/usr/share/kernel} > for script in postinst postrm preinst prerm; do > mkdir -p "${pdir}${debhookdir}/${script}.d" > + mkdir -p "${pdir}${debdistrohookdir}/${script}.d" > > mkdir -p "${pdir}/DEBIAN" > cat <<-EOF > "${pdir}/DEBIAN/${script}" > @@ -84,7 +90,30 @@ install_linux_image () { > # Tell initramfs builder whether it's wanted > export INITRD=$(if_enabled_echo CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD Yes No) > > - test -d ${debhookdir}/${script}.d && run-parts --arg="${KERNELRELEASE}" --arg="/${installed_image_path}" ${debhookdir}/${script}.d > + if test -d "${debhookdir}/${script}.d" && test -d "${debdistrohookdir}/${script}.d"; then > + if test -n "$(find "${debhookdir}/${script}.d" -maxdepth 0 -empty)" ; then This must be escaped like "\$(find ...)" because the 'find' command must be evaluated on the installed system instead of on the build machine. However, the added complexities look skeptical to me. If /usr/share/kernel/postinst.d/ exists on the installed system, we can assume run-parts>=5.21 exists there. One more thing, do we need a new env variable for the second search path? If a user wants to add more search paths for custom hooks, they can pass multiple words to KDEB_HOOKDIR. export KDEB_HOOKDIR=" /home/masahiro/etc/kernel /etc/kernel /usr/local/share/kernel /usr/share/kernel " This is compatible with the current "single path for KDEB_HOOKDIR" usage, and flexible enough for the new extension. > + # KDEB_HOOKDIR is empty, execute run-parts on KDEB_DISTRO_HOOKDIR only > + run-parts --arg="${KERNELRELEASE}" --arg="/${installed_image_path}" "${debdistrohookdir}/${script}.d" > + elif test -n "$(find "${debdistrohookdir}/${script}.d" -maxdepth 0 -empty)" ; then > + # KDEB_DISTROHOOKDIR is empty, execute run-parts on KDEB_HOOKDIR only > + run-parts --arg="${KERNELRELEASE}" --arg="/${installed_image_path}" "${debhookdir}/${script}.d" > + else > + # Both KDEB_HOOKDIR and KDEB_DISTROHOOKDIR contain files. It is the > + # responsibility of the distribution package that placed files into > + # KDEB_DISTROHOOKDIR to add a Depends: debianutils (>= 5.21) > + if run-parts --help 2>&1 | grep -Fxq "Usage: run-parts [OPTION]... DIRECTORY [DIRECTORY ...]"; then > + run-parts --arg="${KERNELRELEASE}" --arg="/${installed_image_path}" "${debhookdir}/${script}.d" "${debdistrohookdir}/${script}.d" > + else > + echo "E: Ignoring maintainer scripts in ${debdistrohookdir} because run-parts is too old (5.21 required)" >&2 > + run-parts --arg="${KERNELRELEASE}" --arg="/${installed_image_path}" "${debhookdir}/${script}.d" > + fi > + fi > + elif test -d "${debhookdir}/${script}.d"; then > + run-parts --arg="${KERNELRELEASE}" --arg="/${installed_image_path}" "${debhookdir}/${script}.d" > + elif test -d "${debdistrohookdir}/${script}.d"; then > + run-parts --arg="${KERNELRELEASE}" --arg="/${installed_image_path}" "${debdistrohookdir}/${script}.d" > + fi > + > exit 0 > EOF > chmod 755 "${pdir}/DEBIAN/${script}" > -- > 2.39.2 > > -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
