On 11/5/24 18:33, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
I previously suggested checking how the 'if' statement is handled.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK7LNAQ8D4OVT81iTVs8jjrBXX6Zgwc+VJ_vb7hb4J-vCZZN=g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
I think I understand now what you were saying. I misunderstood what you
were saying because I thought that you were saying that the "if" blocks
were not implemented.
To paraphrase, I believe that you are saying that the "choice" blocks
should have a similar style to the "if" blocks.
I will take a look at the patch that you sent and figure out how it
would work. I would like some clarification on the information in the
choice blocks that are not "depends." Should those also have the same
style as the "if" block?
I am not sure if you saw this email:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/994efba2-2829-4874-b5fa-9f5317f6ea6b@xxxxxxxxx/
There are lots of information, specifically "prompts" and "defaults"
that are distributed to each of the config options in the "choice" blocks.
BTW, 'menu' also can have 'depends on'.
menu "menu"
depends on FOO
config A
bool "A"
config B
bool "B"
endmenu
This is not implemented, either.
I am not sure how much effort should be invested in this script, though.
I will look into distributing the "menu" information.
