Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] modpost: Produce extended MODVERSIONS information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> > If booted against an old kernel, it will
> > behave as though there is no modversions information.
>
> Huh? This I don't get. If you have the new libkmod and boot
> an old kernel, that should just not break becauase well, long
> symbols were not ever supported properly anyway, so no regression.

Specifically, if you set NO_BASIC_MODVERSIONS, build a module, and
then load said module with a kernel *before* EXTENDED_MODVERSIONS
existed, it will see no modversion info on the module to check. This
will be true regardless of symbol length.

>
> I'm not quite sure I understood your last comment here though,
> can you clarify what you meant?
>
> Anyway, so now that this is all cleared up, the next question I have
> is, let's compare a NO_BASIC_MODVERSIONS world now, given that the
> userspace requirements aren't large at all, what actual benefits does
> using this new extended mod versions have? Why wouldn't a distro end
> up preferring this for say a future release for all modules?

I think a distro will end up preferring using this for all modules,
but was intending to put both in for a transitional period until the
new format was more accepted.

>
>   Luis




[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux