On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 3:18 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ah, I see. The relevant discussion took place on zulip[0]. As for policy: I'm > guessing there isn't one, and the whole endeavor is best-effort. I am aware of that discussion (it is in our Zulip), but I was referring to the kernel-wide macOS support, because I had read Daniel's summary and v2 of that series, and it is not clear to me what is the latest status on supporting macOS. In particular, there were some patches NAK'd with arguments that may apply here (e.g. extra process spawns). Moreover, how will it get tested going forward? (e.g. currently I can't, but I could look into setting something up if the kernel wants to support this). If it breaks, is it considered a bug? etc. > Thanks Miguel! As this is my first patch, please let me know if further action > is required. You're welcome! Yes, a new version would be needed with the proper tags/authorship, but first we should probably wait to hear what Kbuild (or the kernel) thinks. Cheers, Miguel
