On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 6:21 AM Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 01:32:56AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 1:45 AM Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Fix the following rpmbuild warning: > > > > > > $ make srcrpm-pkg > > > ... > > > RPM build warnings: > > > source_date_epoch_from_changelog set but %changelog is missing > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > scripts/package/mkspec | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/scripts/package/mkspec b/scripts/package/mkspec > > > index ce201bfa8377..e45fdb12fbc7 100755 > > > --- a/scripts/package/mkspec > > > +++ b/scripts/package/mkspec > > > @@ -28,3 +28,26 @@ cat<<EOF > > > EOF > > > > > > cat "${srctree}/scripts/package/kernel.spec" > > > + > > > +# collect the user's name and email address for the changelog entry > > > +if [ "$(command -v git)" ]; then > > > + name=$(git config user.name) || true > > > + email=$(git config user.email) || true > > > +fi > > > + > > > +if [ ! "${name:+set}" ]; then > > > + name=${KBUILD_BUILD_USER:-$(id -nu)} > > > +fi > > > + > > > +if [ ! "${email:+set}" ]; then > > > + buildhost=${KBUILD_BUILD_HOST:-$(hostname -f 2>/dev/null || hostname)} > > > + builduser=${KBUILD_BUILD_USER:-$(id -nu)} > > > + email="${builduser}@${buildhost}" > > > +fi > > > + > > > +cat << EOF > > > + > > > +%changelog > > > +* $(LC_ALL=C; date +'%a %b %d %Y') ${name} <${email}> - ${KERNELRELEASE} > > > > > > I am not sure whether the version is required or not. > > > > In the following guide, not all entries have the version. > > > > https://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/RPM/4/html/RPM_Guide/ch09s06.html > > > > > > If you want to add the version, perhaps is it better to > > follow the fedora convention? > > > > > > The spec file of Fedora looks as follows. > > The version is enclosed in the square brackets. > > > > %changelog > > * Wed Dec 13 2023 Augusto Caringi <acaringi@xxxxxxxxxx> [6.6.7-0] > > - Add rhbz#2253632 rhbz#2253633 to BugsFixed (Justin M. Forbes) > > - Turn on DRM_ACCEL drivers for Fedora (Justin M. Forbes) > > - Linux v6.6.7 > > > > > > > > > > Or, is this not important because there is no strict format? > > Darn, I've been using the "- release" pattern for my RPMs for > quite a long time, as circa 2010 that was the suggestion. > I guess I just got used to it and never really noticed > the change along the way. > > There's not a strict format, though, and it's just nice > to have the version showing in there. > I have no strong feelings about the format we should be > going to go with, so I'll leave it up to you. > > What is the format you'd prefer for the changelog entry? > Leave it as it is in this patch, or adopt the Fedora standard? > > I'll wait for your input before refreshing this patch (or not) My preference is to get rid of the version number from %changelog because this is an upstream snapshot source package, and there is only one entry. The version number is already expressed in the "Version:" field. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada