On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:11:08AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 7/14/24 16:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > The condition 'select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN' is always true because > > there is 'select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN' statement above. > > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > index c87d16b12e9b..d37cbfc3031e 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > @@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ config ARM64 > > select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL > > select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE > > select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN > > - select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC if HAVE_ARCH_KASAN > > - select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_SW_TAGS if HAVE_ARCH_KASAN > > - select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_HW_TAGS if (HAVE_ARCH_KASAN && ARM64_MTE) > > + select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC > > + select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_SW_TAGS > > + select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_HW_TAGS if ARM64_MTE > > # Some instrumentation may be unsound, hence EXPERT > > select HAVE_ARCH_KCSAN if EXPERT > > select HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE > > There is another similar instance with HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER as well. > Just wondering if the following change should be folded in here ? > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -210,8 +210,8 @@ config ARM64 > select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD > select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER > select HAVE_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION > - select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL if HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER > select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER > + select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL > select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS > select HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF if PERF_EVENTS && \ > HW_PERF_EVENTS && HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI That looks like a sensible cleanup, but I think it'd be better as a separate patch. It looks like that has always been redundant since it was introduced in commit 3646970322464c21 ("arm64: ftrace: Enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL") ... would you mind spinning a patch? Mark.