On 03.07.24 01:40, Wei Yang wrote:
Instead of accessing zoneref->zone directly, use zonelist_zone() like
other places for consistency.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index cb7f265c2b96..a34a74f5b113 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1690,7 +1690,7 @@ static inline struct zoneref *first_zones_zonelist(struct zonelist *zonelist,
zone = zonelist_zone(z))
#define for_next_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, highidx, nodemask) \
- for (zone = z->zone; \
+ for (zone = zonelist_zone(z); \
zone; \
z = next_zones_zonelist(++z, highidx, nodemask), \
zone = zonelist_zone(z))
Should we do the same in movable_only_nodes as well to be consistent in
that file?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
