Please, ignore this version.
the previous one was to add a helper function and that seemed to work,
but on rework to actually use KBUILD_AFLAGS instead of adding a new
function I certainly haven't tested it enough.
Going to prepare version 2, sorry for the noise.
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 00:24, Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay
<devnull+0x7f454c46.gmail.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> At Arista some products use compatible 32-bit userspace running on x86.
> As a part of disto build for ia32 it also compiles the 64-bit kernel.
> While the toolchain for the kernel build is yet the same, with 64-bit gcc:
> > / @Bru-na-Boinne% file /usr/bin/gcc-11
> > /usr/bin/gcc-11: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, BuildID[sha1]=6571ad50d8f12eece053f1bac7a95a2c767f32c9, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, stripped
>
> It seems that gcc is being smart and detects that it's running in
> a 32-bit container (personality flag? 32-bit mmap base? something else
> inherited post-exec? haven't yet figured it out) and by default tries
> to build 32-bit binaries.
>
> That results in a failing toolchain check:
> > / @Bru-na-Boinne% printf "%b\n" "wrussq %rax, (%rbx)" | /usr/bin/gcc-11 -Wa,--fatal-warnings -c -x assembler-with-cpp -o /dev/null -
> > <stdin>: Assembler messages:
> > <stdin>:1: Error: `wrussq' is only supported in 64-bit mode
>
> Which passes when -m64 is directly specify for the build check:
> > / @Bru-na-Boinne% printf "%b\n" "wrussq %rax, (%rbx)" | /usr/bin/gcc-11 -m64 -Wa,--fatal-warnings -c -x assembler-with-cpp -o /dev/null -
> > / @Bru-na-Boinne% echo $?
> > 0
>
> As a result, kbuild produces different value for CONFIG_AS_WRUSS
> for native 64-bit containers and ia32 containers with 64-bit gcc,
> which produces different kernels with enabled/disabled
> CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK.
>
> arch/x86/Makefile already properly defines KBUILD_AFLAGS += -m64,
> which is luckly already available at the point of toolchain check
> in arch/x86/Kconfig.assembler
>
> By hacking around Kbuild variable the following way:
> > --- a/scripts/Kconfig.include
> > +++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
> > @@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ left_paren := (
> >
> > # $(if-success,<command>,<then>,<else>)
> > # Return <then> if <command> exits with 0, <else> otherwise.
> > -if-success = $(shell,{ $(1); } >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "$(2)" || echo "$(3)")
> > +if-success = $(shell,echo '$(1)' 1>&2;{ $(1); } >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "$(2)" || echo "$(3)")
>
> I got the following output for the toolchain check, before:
> > linux @Bru-na-Boinne% make ARCH=x86_64 oldconfig V=1 2>&1 | grep wrus
> > printf "%b\n" "wrussq %rax,(%rbx)" | gcc -c -x assembler-with-cpp -o /dev/null -
>
> and after:
> > linux @Bru-na-Boinne% make ARCH=x86_64 oldconfig V=1 2>&1 | grep wrus
> > printf "%b\n" "wrussq %rax,(%rbx)" | gcc -D__ASSEMBLY__ -fno-PIE -m64 -c -x assembler-with-cpp -o /dev/null -
>
> Which seems appropriate to me.
> This also reflects the existing definition in scripts/Makefile.compiler
> for $(as-instr) that already has $(KBUILD_AFLAGS).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> scripts/Kconfig.include | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Kconfig.include b/scripts/Kconfig.include
> index 3ee8ecfb8c04..d8574c1faf2d 100644
> --- a/scripts/Kconfig.include
> +++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ ld-option = $(success,$(LD) -v $(1))
>
> # $(as-instr,<instr>)
> # Return y if the assembler supports <instr>, n otherwise
> -as-instr = $(success,printf "%b\n" "$(1)" | $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) -Wa$(comma)--fatal-warnings -c -x assembler-with-cpp -o /dev/null -)
> +as-instr = $(success,printf "%b\n" "$(1)" | $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS) -Wa$(comma)--fatal-warnings -c -x assembler-with-cpp -o /dev/null -)
>
> # check if $(CC) and $(LD) exist
> $(error-if,$(failure,command -v $(CC)),C compiler '$(CC)' not found)
>
> ---
> base-commit: 2c71fdf02a95b3dd425b42f28fd47fb2b1d22702
> change-id: 20240410-as-instr-opt-wrussq-48ec37e36204
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
