On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 8:09 PM Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
<jtornosm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Some architectures, like aarch64 ones, need a dtb file to configure the
> hardware. The default dtb file can be preloaded from u-boot, but the final
> and/or more complete dtb file needs to be able to be loaded later from
> rootfs.
>
> Add the possible dtb files to the kernel rpm and mimic Fedora shipping
> process, storing the dtb files in the module directory. These dtb files
> will be copied to /boot directory by the install scripts, but add fallback
> just in case, checking if the content in /boot directory is correct.
>
> Mark the files installed to /boot as %ghost to make sure they will be
> removed when the package is uninstalled.
>
> Tested with Fedora Rawhide (x86_64 and aarch64) with dnf and rpm tools.
> In addition, fallback was also tested after modifying the install scripts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> scripts/package/kernel.spec | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/package/kernel.spec b/scripts/package/kernel.spec
> index c256b73cca3e..5c4c1ffcba6c 100644
> --- a/scripts/package/kernel.spec
> +++ b/scripts/package/kernel.spec
> @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ cp $(%{make} %{makeflags} -s image_name) %{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEAS
> %{make} %{makeflags} INSTALL_HDR_PATH=%{buildroot}/usr headers_install
> cp System.map %{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}
> cp .config %{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/config
> +if [ -d "${srctree}/arch/${SRCARCH}/boot/dts" ];then
${srctree} and ${SRCARCH} are not always defined in kernel.spec.
They are not defined if you directly run 'rpmbuild -rb <SRPM>'.
The following will correctly check the presence of
${srctree}/arch/${SRCARCH}/boot/dts.
if %{make} %{makeflags} run-command KBUILD_RUN_COMMAND='test -d
${srctree}/arch/${SRCARCH}/boot/dts'; then
> + %{make} %{makeflags} INSTALL_DTBS_PATH=%{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb dtbs_install
> +fi
> ln -fns /usr/src/kernels/%{KERNELRELEASE} %{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/build
> %if %{with_devel}
> %{make} %{makeflags} run-command KBUILD_RUN_COMMAND='${srctree}/scripts/package/install-extmod-build %{buildroot}/usr/src/kernels/%{KERNELRELEASE}'
> @@ -81,6 +84,14 @@ ln -fns /usr/src/kernels/%{KERNELRELEASE} %{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEA
> echo "%ghost /boot/${x}-%{KERNELRELEASE}"
> done
>
> + if [ -d "%{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb" ];then
> + echo "/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb"
> + for x in $(find "%{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb" -name "*" \
> + -exec realpath --relative-to "%{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb" {} \;); do
> + echo "%ghost /boot/dtb-%{KERNELRELEASE}/${x}"
> + done
Instead of the for-loop, you can write it in one command:
find "%{buildroot}/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb" -printf
"%%%ghost /boot/dtb-%{KERNELRELEASE}/%%P\n"
Is the escaping % complex?
> + fi
> +
> echo "%exclude /lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/build"
> } > %{buildroot}/kernel.list
>
> @@ -96,6 +107,12 @@ for file in vmlinuz System.map config; do
> cp "/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/${file}" "/boot/${file}-%{KERNELRELEASE}"
> fi
> done
> +if [ -d "/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb" ]; then
> + if ! diff -rq "/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb" "/boot/dtb-%{KERNELRELEASE}" &>/dev/null; then
I do not recommend the bash'ism "&>/dev/null".
The scriptlet is executed by /bin/sh, which
may not be bash, although on most RPM-based
distro, it is a symlink to bash.
You can squash the nested if-conditionals:
if [ -d "/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb" ] && \
! diff -rq "/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb"
"/boot/dtb-%{KERNELRELEASE}" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
...
fi
> + rm -rf "/boot/dtb-%{KERNELRELEASE}"
> + cp -r "/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/dtb" "/boot/dtb-%{KERNELRELEASE}"
> + fi
> +fi
> if [ ! -e "/lib/modules/%{KERNELRELEASE}/modules.dep" ]; then
> /usr/sbin/depmod %{KERNELRELEASE}
> fi
> --
> 2.43.2
>
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
