Hello Tom,
On 29.11.23 20:02, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:59:00PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> a few more comments after decompiling the FIT image:
>>
>> On 29.11.23 18:21, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> + with fsw.add_node('kernel'):
>>> + fsw.property_string('description', args.name)
>>> + fsw.property_string('type', 'kernel_noload')
>>
>> The specification only says no loading done, but doesn't explain what it
>> means for a bootloader to _not_ load an image. Looking into the U-Boot commit
>> b9b50e89d317 ("image: Implement IH_TYPE_KERNEL_NOLOAD") that introduces this,
>> apparently no loading means ignoring load and entry address?
>>
>> I presume missing load and entry is something older U-Boot versions
>> were unhappy about? Please let me know if the semantics are as I understood,
>> so I can prepare a barebox patch supporting it.
>
> So the matching side for this series in U-Boot is:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=382849&state=*
>
> And in short, for IH_TYPE_KERNEL_NOLOAD we do our best to use it
> in-place. For decompression we allocate some space to decompress to.
Thanks. I am still curious why "kernel" couldn't have been used back then
with missing entry and load address to arrive at the same result?
Thanks,
Ahmad
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
