Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: drop -Wall and related disables from cflags as redundant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 9:35 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The kernel top level Makefile, and recently scripts/Makefile.extrawarn,
> have included -Wall, and the disables -Wno-format-security and
> $(call cc-disable-warning,frame-address,) for a very long time. They're
> redundant in our local subdir-ccflags-y and can be dropped.
>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>


I made a similar suggestion in the past
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20190515043753.9853-1-yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

So, I am glad that Intel has decided to de-duplicate the flags.



I think you can drop more flags.

For example,

 subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-sign-compare


It is set by scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
unless W=3 is passed.


If W=3 is set by a user, -Wsign-compare should be warned
as it is the user's request.


drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile negates W=3.
There is no good reason to do so.


Same applied to


subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-shift-negative-value






> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> index dec78efa452a..623f81217442 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> @@ -5,22 +5,20 @@
>
>  # Add a set of useful warning flags and enable -Werror for CI to prevent
>  # trivial mistakes from creeping in. We have to do this piecemeal as we reject
> -# any patch that isn't warning clean, so turning on -Wall -Wextra (or W=1) we
> +# any patch that isn't warning clean, so turning on -Wextra (or W=1) we
>  # need to filter out dubious warnings.  Still it is our interest
>  # to keep running locally with W=1 C=1 until we are completely clean.
>  #
> -# Note the danger in using -Wall -Wextra is that when CI updates gcc we
> +# Note the danger in using -Wextra is that when CI updates gcc we
>  # will most likely get a sudden build breakage... Hopefully we will fix
>  # new warnings before CI updates!
> -subdir-ccflags-y := -Wall -Wextra
> -subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-format-security
> +subdir-ccflags-y := -Wextra
>  subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-unused-parameter
>  subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-type-limits
>  subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-missing-field-initializers
>  subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-sign-compare
>  subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-shift-negative-value
>  subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-option, -Wunused-but-set-variable)
> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, frame-address)
>  subdir-ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR) += -Werror
>
>  # Fine grained warnings disable
> --
> 2.39.2
>


--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada




[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux