On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:27 PM Boris Kolpackov <boris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is there interest in the Qt6 port of qconf (which is currently Qt5)? > > I took an exploratory stab at it and I've managed to make it compile > and run with relatively few changes, though there are quite a few > warnings about using deprecated stuff. > > I can see three possible approaches here: > > 1. Drop Qt5 support and port qconf to be exclusively Qt6. This should > allow cleaning up all the deprecated stuff. > > 2. Support Qt5 and Qt6 in the same qconf.cc. With this approach it's > unlikely we will be able to cleanup the deprecated stuff without > turning it into an #if soup. > > 3. Leave qconf.cc to be Qt5-only and make the changes in the qconf6.cc > copy. This will allow us to clean up all the deprecated stuff but > will require applying further changes to two files until we drop > support for Qt5. > > Thoughts? I like 1 or 2, depending on the size of #if soup. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
