在 2023/6/25 17:56, WANG Xuerui 写道: > From: WANG Xuerui <git@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The invtlb instruction has been supported by upstream LoongArch > toolchains from day one, so ditch the raw opcode trickery and just use > plain inline asm for it. > > While at it, also make the invtlb asm statements barriers, for proper > modeling of the side effects. The functions are also marked as > __always_inline instead of just "inline", because they cannot work at > all if not inlined: the op argument will not be compile-time const in > that case, thus failing to satisfy the "i" constraint. > > The signature of the other more specific invtlb wrappers contain unused > arguments right now, but these are not removed right away in order for > the patch to be focused. In the meantime, assertions are added to ensure > no accidental misuse happens before the refactor. (The more specific > wrappers cannot re-use the generic invtlb wrapper, because the ISA > manual says $zero shall be used in case a particular op does not take > the respective argument: re-using the generic wrapper would mean losing > control over the register usage.) > > Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h | 43 ++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h > index 0dc9ee2b05d2..da7a3b5b9374 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h > +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h > @@ -88,52 +88,47 @@ enum invtlb_ops { > INVTLB_GID_ADDR = 0x16, > }; > > -/* > - * invtlb op info addr > - * (0x1 << 26) | (0x24 << 20) | (0x13 << 15) | > - * (addr << 10) | (info << 5) | op > - */ > -static inline void invtlb(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr) > +static __always_inline void invtlb(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr) > { > __asm__ __volatile__( > - "parse_r addr,%0\n\t" > - "parse_r info,%1\n\t" > - ".word ((0x6498000) | (addr << 10) | (info << 5) | %2)\n\t" > - : > - : "r"(addr), "r"(info), "i"(op) > + "invtlb %0, %1, %2\n\t" > : > + : "i"(op), "r"(info), "r"(addr) > + : "memory" > ); > } > > -static inline void invtlb_addr(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr) > +static __always_inline void invtlb_addr(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr) > { > + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(info) || info != 0); > __asm__ __volatile__( > - "parse_r addr,%0\n\t" > - ".word ((0x6498000) | (addr << 10) | (0 << 5) | %1)\n\t" > - : > - : "r"(addr), "i"(op) > + "invtlb %0, $zero, %1\n\t" > : > + : "i"(op), "r"(addr) > + : "memory" > ); > } > > -static inline void invtlb_info(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr) > +static __always_inline void invtlb_info(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr) > { > + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(addr) || addr != 0); > __asm__ __volatile__( > - "parse_r info,%0\n\t" > - ".word ((0x6498000) | (0 << 10) | (info << 5) | %1)\n\t" > - : > - : "r"(info), "i"(op) > + "invtlb %0, %1, $zero\n\t" > : > + : "i"(op), "r"(info) > + : "memory" > ); > } macro parse_r is not used here, and it is not used any more. Can you remove definition of this macro also? Regards Bibo Mao > > -static inline void invtlb_all(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr) > +static __always_inline void invtlb_all(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr) > { > + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(info) || info != 0); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(addr) || addr != 0); > __asm__ __volatile__( > - ".word ((0x6498000) | (0 << 10) | (0 << 5) | %0)\n\t" > + "invtlb %0, $zero, $zero\n\t" > : > : "i"(op) > - : > + : "memory" > ); > } >