On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:12:24PM -0700, Fangrui Song wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 2:58 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 02:54:06PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error has been supported since GCC 5.1 and > > > Clang 3.2. The minimum supported version of these according to > > > Documentation/process/changes.rst is 5.1 and 11.0.0 respectively. Drop > > > this cc-option check. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > As an aside, we should really consider having some standard format of > > comment around cc-option checks so that we can easily remove them when > > they become stale... > > > > > --- > > > Masahiro, Kees: get_maintainer.pl leaves much to be desired for this > > > file. Can one of you please pick this up? > > > > > > lib/Kconfig.ubsan | 1 - > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan > > > index fd15230a703b..0e7ad0782399 100644 > > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan > > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan > > > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ if UBSAN > > > config UBSAN_TRAP > > > bool "On Sanitizer warnings, abort the running kernel code" > > > depends on !COMPILE_TEST > > > - depends on $(cc-option, -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error) > > > help > > > Building kernels with Sanitizer features enabled tends to grow > > > the kernel size by around 5%, due to adding all the debugging > > > -- > > > 2.40.0.577.gac1e443424-goog > > > > > > > -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error is a legacy option from 2013 when > -fcatch-undefined-behavior instead of -fsanitize=undefined enabled > UBSan. > On the Clang side, http://reviews.llvm.org/D10464 added > -fsanitize-trap= in June 2015. > It's best to use -fsanitize-trap=undefined and avoid uses of > -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error. But that's Clang-only. -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error works for both GCC and Clang. -- Kees Cook
