On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 3:46 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 3:52 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I do not think we need to repeat what is written in 'man nm'. > > I agree, but the paragraphs following the one you removed refer to a, > U, N, w, T, t, and W now with no context that those are the nm > formats. > > I'm ok with this patch, but please consider adding a sentence along > the lines of: > > The following refers to the symbol type as per nm(1). OK, I will fold this comment locally. Thanks. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
