On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:41 AM Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Distros like debian install the generic "cc" name for both gcc and clang, > and the plumbing already does CC_VERSION_TEXT to include Makefile.clang. > > Previously: https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2202.0/01505.html > Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Makefile | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 3f6628780eb2..0ac57ae3b45f 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ endif > HOSTCC = $(LLVM_PREFIX)clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > HOSTCXX = $(LLVM_PREFIX)clang++$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > else > -HOSTCC = gcc > +HOSTCC := $(shell cc --version >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo cc || echo gcc) 'cc' only makes sense for the host compiler, which is configured by 'update-alternative'. I tried it before, but LLVM folks preferred using $(LLVM) to choose clang/gcc. > HOSTCXX = g++ > endif > HOSTRUSTC = rustc > @@ -503,7 +503,8 @@ OBJDUMP = $(LLVM_PREFIX)llvm-objdump$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > READELF = $(LLVM_PREFIX)llvm-readelf$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > STRIP = $(LLVM_PREFIX)llvm-strip$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > else > -CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > +CC := $(CROSS_COMPILE)$(shell $(CROSS_COMPILE)cc --version \ > + >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo cc || echo gcc) This hunk sets up GCC/binutils. So, cc does not make sense. NACK. > LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar > NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada