On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:40 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Masahiro! > > On Sun, 2023-02-19 at 23:15 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > The 0day bot reports a lot of warnings (or errors due to CONFIG_WERROR) > > like this: > > > > cc1: error: arch/sh/include/mach-hp6xx: No such file or directory [-Werror=missing-include-dirs] > > > > Indeed, arch/sh/include/mach-hp6xx does not exist. > > > > -Wmissing-include-dirs is W=1 warning, but it may be annoying > > when CONFIG_BTRFS_FS is enabled because fs/btrfs/Makefile > > unconditionally adds this warning option. > > > > arch/sh/Makefile defines machdir-y for two purposes: > > > > - Build platform code in arch/sh/boards/mach-*/ > > - Add arch/sh/include/mach-*/ to the header search path > > > > For the latter, some platforms use arch/sh/include/mach-common/ instead > > of having its own arch/sh/include/mach-*/. > > > > Drop unneeded machdir-y to not include non-existing include directory. > > > > To build arch/sh/boards/mach-*/, use the standard obj-y syntax in > > arch/sh/boards/Makefile. > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302190641.30VVXnPb-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Thanks for your patches! I'm still waiting for my kernel.org account to be created, > so I can set up my own linux-sh tree. I hope that happens next week. There are already > some patches piling up. > > Adrian That's good news. I just thought arch/sh is no longer maintained. (I saw a patch for the entire removal of arch/sh/ somewhere). I leave this series up to you. > -- > .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > : :' : Debian Developer > `. `' Physicist > `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
