On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:00 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The MAINTAINERS repository entry specifies "kconfig" as the branch, but > the repository itself has "kbuild". > > Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index a36df9ed283d..98da2af0a653 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -11171,7 +11171,7 @@ M: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> > L: linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > S: Maintained > Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kbuild/list/ > -T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git kconfig > +T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git kbuild > F: Documentation/kbuild/kconfig* > F: scripts/Kconfig.include > F: scripts/kconfig/ > -- > 2.34.1 > I sometimes created the 'kconfig' branch when I had a large batch of kconfig changes, but 8ca5297e7e38f2dc8c753d33a5092e7be181fff0 was the last time I did that. Indeed 'kconfig' does not always exist, so I am fine with this (and rest of the patch set). Thanks. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
