On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 8:15 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:23 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe, your purpose is to use sed consistently, but
> > perhaps you can avoid forking sed if you know the
> > format of the first line.
>
> The most unknown format would be the one of the libclang check, where
> there may be other lines before the one we are interested in. However,
> the pattern expansion would still match newlines, right?
>
> > BTW, what is missing here is, you do not check if
> > ${RUSTC} is really rustc.
> >
> > I can fool this script to print
> > "arithmetic expression: expecting primary: "100000 * + 100 * + "
>
> We can test if nothing was printed by `sed` for that (or do it with
> shell builtins).
>
> Having said that, I would say fooling the script on purpose is an more
> of an oddity compared to the case `MAKEFLAGS` attempts to cover
> (please see my reply on the other patch). So if we cover this, then I
> would say we should really cover the other one.
get_canonical_version() in scripts/as-version.sh has
a little more trick to avoid
"arithmetic expression: expecting primary: "100000 * + 100 * + "
but it is up to you.
> Cheers,
> Miguel
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
