On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 05:38:55PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 5:02 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Given I've started with cleaning up one driver already, I'll keep my eye
> > on further breakage.
>
> I wonder if we could just check for code generation differences some way.
> Having some scripting automation that just notices "this changes code
> generation in function X" might actually be interesting, and judging
> by my quick tests might not be *too* verbose.
Or even just some allyesconfig diffing.
> I tested a couple of files, and was able to find differences, eg
>
> # kernel/sched/core.c:8861: pr_info("task:%-15.15s state:%c",
> p->comm, task_state_to_char(p));
> - movzbl state_char.149(%rax), %edx # state_char[_60], state_char[_60]
> + movsbl state_char.149(%rax), %edx # state_char[_60], state_char[_60]
> call _printk #
>
> because the 'char' for the '%c' is passed as an integer. And the
Seems harmless though.
> tracing code has the
>
> .is_signed = is_signed_type(_type)
>
> initializers, which obviously change when the type is 'char'.
And likewise, looking at the types of initializers that's used with.
Actually, for the array one, unsigned is probably more sensible anyway.
The thing is, anyhow, that most code that works without -funsigned-char
*will* work with it, because the core of the kernel obviously works fine
on ARM already. The problematic areas will be x86-specific drivers that
have never been tested on other archs. i915 comes to mind -- as a
general rule, it already does all manner of insane things. But there's
obviously a lot of other hardware that's only ever run on Intel. So I'm
much more concerned about that than I am about code in, say, kernel/sched.
Jason
