Re: base-files: /etc/os-release should contain VERSION variables for testing and unstable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sedat,

Sorry for my late replay.


On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 6:56 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [ CC linux-kbuild folks (see [0] ]



Can you give me more context of this email?




> Hi,
>
> I am using Debian/unstable AMD64 and doing Linux-kernel upstream
> development and testing.
>
> People using bindeb-pkg (mkdebian) from Linux-kernel sources
> (scripts/packages) to build and test their selfmade Debian kernels get
> a now a "n/a" for distribution.



Right, if I try the latest sid,
"lsb_release -cs" returns "n/a".
It returned "sid" before IIRC.


What was changed in Debian?
Any change in the lsb_release program?







>
> Background (see [1]):
>
> [ scripts/package/mkdebian ]
>
> # Try to determine distribution
> if [ -n "$KDEB_CHANGELOG_DIST" ]; then
>         distribution=$KDEB_CHANGELOG_DIST
> # In some cases lsb_release returns the codename as n/a, which breaks
> dpkg-parsechangelog
> elif distribution=$(lsb_release -cs 2>/dev/null) && [ -n
> "$distribution" ] && [ "$distribution" != "n/a" ]; then
>         : # nothing to do in this case
> else
>         distribution="unstable"
>         echo >&2 "Using default distribution of 'unstable' in the changelog"
>         echo >&2 "Install lsb-release or set \$KDEB_CHANGELOG_DIST explicitly"
> fi
>
> Personally, I set hardcoded in my kernel build-script as a workaround:
>
> distribution="bookworm"
>
> Gioele suggested me to enrich /etc/os-release with:
>
> VERSION_ID=unstable <--- XXX: I prefer sid because of PRETTY_NAME and
> it's shorter
> VERSION_CODENAME=bookworm
>
> In the end the file looks like:
>
> PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid"
> NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"
> ID=debian
> VERSION_ID=sid
> VERSION_CODENAME=bookworm
> HOME_URL="https://www.debian.org/";
> SUPPORT_URL="https://www.debian.org/support";
> BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.debian.org/";
>
> ...and this seems to work:
>
> # lsb_release -cs
> No LSB modules are available.
> bookworm
>
> Please, provide a solution not to break workflows that were successful
> for years.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> -Sedat-
>
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/MAINTAINERS#n11005
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/package/mkdebian#n123



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada



[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux