On Thu, Jun 23 at 7:27:29 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This probably also needs a dependency on !COMPILE_TEST so we don't
> report compile-time problems that are specific to -O3.
Honestly, let's just remove -O3 entirely.
Enabling it, and then not even build-testing the result, is just about
the *worst* possible case. That's just horrible.
The argument that "but ARC uses it" is not an argument. It was always
a bad argument, and ARC needs to just fix whatever it is that made it
an issue (likely already fixed with a compiler upgrade).
And there is no way I would ever accept this as a "let people try it" when
- as mentioned, just use KCFLAGS=-O3 if you want to
- -O3 has a *loong* history of generating worse code than -O2
so I will *not* be taking these kinds of patches without some very
serious explanations of why -O3 has suddenly become acceptable again.
Those explanations had better be more than "let people try". They
should have in-depth actual performance numbers for a real load, not
some made-up "bigger is better" logic.
Linus
