On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:46:01AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2022 23:05:34 +0530 ALOK JHA <alok08jha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Now that all the fall-through warnings have been addressed in the > > kernel, enable the fall-through warning globally. > > > > Also, update the deprecated.rst file to include implicit fall-through > > as 'deprecated' so people can be pointed to a single location for > > justification. > > > > ... > > > > --- a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst > > @@ -119,3 +119,17 @@ array may exceed the remaining memory in the stack segment. This could > > lead to a crash, possible overwriting sensitive contents at the end of the > > stack (when built without `CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y`), or overwriting > > memory adjacent to the stack (when built without `CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y`) > > + > > +Implicit switch case fall-through > > +--------------------------------- > > > > ... > > > > Documentation/process/deprecated.rst already has a section "Implicit > switch case fall-through". Maybe you're working against an old kernel. > Please update when resending. This looks like spam to me. Let's just ignore this. -- Gustavo
